Welcome to Factonista.org

Factonista is an online freethought advocacy organization that relies on its users for content. Through international broad-based collaboration with its users, and other groups and organizations, it strives to provide timely and comprehensive news, views, reviews, and creative multimedia on issues at the forefront of everything under the umbrella of freethought

Not a member? Register | Lost your password?
Hi and welcome to Factonista. Please keep in mind we're still in BETA. We'll be fully functional very very soon. In the mean while feel free to browse around, read our articles, and participate in our discussions. If you note any bugs and feel like helping us out, forward a quick message to us here. Thanks! [close]

Posts Tagged ‘scientology’

Raise Your Voice

Sunday, October 19th, 2008

It takes a lot to get me angry. But if I look for it on the Internet, I can find it. When reading about Lisa McPherson – who died as a result of Scientology – my blood boils and my fists contract. When I read a website that documents “3,254 people killed, 235,558 injured and over $455,070,000 in economic damages” from quack medicine, frauds and snake-oil merchants who are simply there to make a quick buck, I am ready to burst.

I want to address the question of being involved in sceptical circles, in being (a kind of) social critic. Why do it? “Why do you care about these things?”

I don’t care who you are, dear reader.

I don’t care what your religion, culture, nation or background is. I don’t care what you think of atheism, secularism. I do, however, care about you as a human being. I do care that we try to live as a respectable species, fighting for knowledge, fighting for equality everywhere – all the time. Make no mistake, I want to see past the barriers of incredulity, set up by trenches of ancient ideologies and barbed-wires of recent quackery.

I raise this, to raise your eyes. To raise your voice. I want you to speak out. If you value others’ lives, if you value the gift of reason, if you want to see some peace filter through the nonsense, I am calling upon you to raise your voice. Be it in any words of any format: Through keyboards, microphones or telephones. Be it in talks, conferences, papers, radio-shows.

I am angry and I want you to be angry. We shouldn’t have to settle for 130 children dying each year because their parents are Jehovah’s Witnesses. We should fight, shout and keep kicking as we hear about Muslim women being killed for leaving abusive husbands, when we hear that “[m]ore than 25 … “honor killings” have been confirmed in Britain’s Muslim community in recent years”. We should raise our fists against the retardation of sensibility when reading:

In Saudi Arabia, the Islamic police prevented schoolgirls from leaving a burning building because they were not wearing headscarves and abayas; 15 of the girls died in the inferno.

[Or] The president of Cairo’s Al-Azhar University, a renowned center of Islamic learning, described the proper method of wife-beating in a television interview: “It’s not really beating,” Sheikh Ahmad Al-Tayyeb explained on Egyptian television. “It’s more like punching.”

Why should we remain silent about these things? No longer should people have to die from this. No longer should Muslim women have to face charges of death, stoning or flogging for being raped.

Words can be bullets, no less than ideas can be foundations for change. I don’t care who you are, at this moment, and I ask you to not care who I am either. In this time, we must be able to recognise idiocy, lunacy and the proud march of unreason that parades through our streets, in our backyards, crushing whoever so steps in its path.

And there is little way to stop it, as it contorts into something new. My own president caused undue harm in denying the link between HIV and AIDs. He was supported by the ever-horrid Minister of Health who stated eating fresh fruit and vegetables could prevent AIDS.

Reason comes in fits and spurts, it seems. Dominating every aspect of our lives is a fertile ground for unreason, some parts in full bloom others already seeded. There’s a great deal of it to be torn down, so that we are able to not only lead lives, but actually save them. It is time to start being more aware of the nonsense out there. Please, help us fight this. We may be fighting against certain people and their very bad ideas, but we are also fighting for every single human being to live as a fully-fledged individual, regardless of race, creed, culture.

I don’t care who you are, but if you have fingers or a voice, you can start changing the tide today.

EDIT – The question remains: Why do I care and why should you? Am I pessimistic, negative or cynical?

No! On the contrary: My reason for raising these points of retarded lecherous thinking is to show that we can do better. I believe, quite strongly, that we are better than these things. We are capable of greater good and greater kindness. Instead a lot of people are more worried about other people’s dress-sense, sexual relations, and other vicarious interferences, than they are about happiness, fulfilment and basic respect.

We need to connect on what we know (we are all humans with similar loves, hates, desires) rather than kill each other on what we can not know (god, the afterlife, and paradise). We can do better, I really believe we can. That is why I care and so should you.

A Christian critique of Scientology

Wednesday, August 27th, 2008

We’ve all heard about this strange new religion, this almost science fiction-like organization that worships its dead founder, blames all misfortune on some invading ‘force’ that came into our world millennia before any of us were born, demands money from all of its followers, has a long history of harassing and persecuting apostates, and has an obsessive fear of modern medical science, particularly where psychiatry is concerned. Today I sat down with one of these Christians and talked to him about Scientology.

“Scientology isn’t a religion, it’s a business,” he told me. “Look, it has a strictly-regulated hierarchical structure with a small leadership core- a secretive board of directors, an executive director, a bunch of subsidiaries and underlings that have to do everything that the layer of leadership above them tells them to do. I’m just glad that the College of Cardinals had the good sense to elect a Pope with the courage to stand up to all these New Agey, postmodern cults.”

“Off to a good start,” I muttered.

“And look at their ridiculous cosmology! Why would anyone believe that a superpowerful galactic overlord named Xenu flew a bunch of DC-8s around the galaxy millions of years ago? And all Scientologists are required to accept this by a certain stage of their development within Scientology. Obviously, the truth is that there is one God whose name is Yahweh, who comes in exactly three parts (not two or four), and who had exactly one son named Jesus who died for our sins two thousand years ago and if we don’t surrender to him by telepathy, we’ll be on fire forever.

“That’s just Church doctrine,” he told me. I nodded and scribbled furiously.

“And then they talk about these engrams,” he continued with a scoff. “I mean, come on. Who’s going to believe that all misfortune is because of some outside magical force invading our universe millennia ago? Sin is because of us, not because of some ambiguously powerful, external “Enemy” blasting evil at us! That just wouldn’t make any sense. Why would a loving God let engrams into the world in the first place?”

“Um, maybe we should talk about something else. I mean, what about the endless harassment of apostates? They do that, right?”

“Right, exactly. No matter who you are, if you’re an apostate from Scientology, they will hunt you down. They will harass you, they will harass your family, they will cost you your job, sometimes they will even threaten you with violence. Wait, hold on, I’m getting a text message.” My Christian friend paused and looked at his vibrating cell phone, then pumped his arm in the air and yelled “Praise Jesus!”

“What happened?” I asked him, curiously trying to peer over the screen of his phone.

Webster Cook just got impeached. Ex-Catholic blasphemer got exactly what he deserved. Anyways, what was I saying?”

“Something very, very sad.”

“Oh, yes, that’s right, apostates. But I mean what’s worse is Scientology’s opposition to modern medical science. They treat psychiatry like it’s some kind of pernicious, evil force, and certainly as if it were unscientific. Psychiatry might be completely misguided, but I think that Scientology is just spouting propaganda about its moral intent.”

“Wait, did you say ‘completely misguided?’”

“Well, yeah, I mean, how many psychiatrists do you see who treat the real cause of mental illness?”

I raised an eyebrow. “Which is?”

Demons.” He nodded sternly. “At least, most of the time. OK, at least some of the time.”

“Heh, yeah, I gotcha.” I was busily drawing a profile of John Travolta on my paper. “At least you guys don’t believe in superpowers.”

“Right. The Scientologists think that you can control even the salinity of your own body, and can do other magical things relating to your health, just by believing. They even have silly little magic devices called E-meters to help diagnose your potential for magic powers.” He smiled and rearranged his rosary bracelet. “They should come to some of my weekly meetings to see the real power of the Lord.”

“Um… and what is that, exactly?” I asked carefully, bracing myself for a sneezing fit. “The ‘real’ power of the Lord, I mean.”

“Speaking in tongues, healing by laying on hands, casting out demons. You know, real miracles.” He gave another rather self-assured nod. “Anyways, the biggest shame is how much money they make people pay to be a Scientologist. At least our tithes are voluntary.”

“But what about indulgences?”

“Oh, we stopped those a long time ago,” he said with a blissful smile. “Don’t you know anything about Church history?”

Finally, I just sighed, set down my pencil, and rested my forehead in my palm. “OK, look. You guys ask for tithes, Scientology charges a fee. You guys believe in magic healing, Scientology believes in superpowers. You guys harass your followers and reject medical science, Scientology will kill you, ruin you, or at least let you go insane by denying treatment to the mentally ill. I know you’re a Catholic, but imagine how much worse some of the parallels would be if you were a Christian Scientist or something? You guys love to rail on the evils of cults and dangerous religious groups, but can’t it be said that you guys are just a softcore form of Scientology? Your beliefs are just as ridiculous. Your rituals are just as bizarre. The only difference is that Scientology is better at using courts and cronies to silence critics.”

“You know, there’s a word for people like you.”

“What’s that?”

“Suppressive person.”

The moral of the story is this. Christians worship a man who said “before you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye, pay attention to plank in your own.” And their eyes may be awash in sawdust, but Scientology will kill you for reading this.

South Park + Free Speech = A Bad Day for Religion Part 1

Thursday, August 21st, 2008

South Park (hereafter referred to as SP) is arguably the funniest show on TV.  To many, it is a source of middle ground social commentary.  To me, it is a beacon of hope in a media gone astray with political correctness.  SP transcends political correctness by making use of its right to free speech, and what better way to promote free speech then to attack that which is held most sacred to many Americans – religion.  In fact, 16 episodes of the 11 seasons so far have dealt primarily with “that which is most sacred”, with certain figures and themes popping up on other occasions.

Not only does the content about religion promote free speech, the controversy of this content perpetuates SP’s intent.  Stemming from my love of the show, I’ve decided to take an in depth look at how religion is represented in South Park, and show you how nothing is taboo when you’re an equal opportunity offender.  This week’s post will be on Scientology.

Part 1: Scientology

If there’s any religion (if you can even call it one) that SP has ripped apart piece by piece, it’s Scientology – better known as the Church Cult of Scientology (COS).  Two episodes of SP have dealt with debunking and mocking COS.  The first appearance of COS appeared in “Super Best Friends”.  In this episode, the magician David Blaine creates a cult following that is strikingly reminiscent of COS.  Unfortunately, the episode didn’t actually reference COS.  This didn’t happen until season 9 when Parker and Stone figured it was time to deal out the damage that COS deserved in the episode “Trapped in the Closet”.  To anyone who knows anything about COS, the story is completely absurd, a fact which Parker and Stone make vividly clear in this episode as they caption a visual interpretation of Scientology’s creation story with “This is what Scientologists actually believe.”

What’s funny about this is that the story itself is hilarious, so all SP had to do was show it to the viewers.

Many other parts of this episode completely lampooned this religious cult.  The start of the show has Stan looking for something free to do and comes across a Scientology church that is offering free e-meter tests.  Inside the church everything is ethereal and everyone is overly excited about life.  To say that SP doesn’t try to make Scientology look like a cult in this scene would be more patently absurd than Tom Cruise on Oprah’s couch.  After Stan takes the “free” test the tester tells him:

“… you are one messed-up kid… I’m afraid that you are completely miserable and totally depressed…there’s certainly no question that you are a perfect candidate for Scientology.”

Stan, a young and ignorant child, is helpless against these claims.

We all know that COS is in it for the Benjamins. SP makes this known by having Stan tell a crowd that “Scientology is just a big fat global scam” at the end of the episode.  SP goes one step further, by having the president of COS claim “You don’t actually believe this crap, do you?? Dummy! Brainwashed alien souls?? E-meters and thetan levels??.”

As sure as Parker and Stone were this episode would offend Scientologists, Isaac Hayes – the Scientology practicing voice of Chef – quit the show.  And that wasn’t the only negative outcome of the episode.  Viacom, who owns comedy central, had the original airing of the show pulled because of the portrayal of Tom Cruise.  Cruise threatened to back out of Mission Impossible 3 endorsements if Paramount, who is owned by Viacom, didn’t tell comedy central to pull it.  Cruise also threatened to sue SP.  Parker and Stone predicted this would happen and so added this little ditty to the end of the episode:

Stan: Look, everybody, we’re all looking for answer, you know. We all want to understand who we are and where we come from, but… sometimes we want to know the answers so badly that we… believe just about anything.
Man 2: Huh?
Woman: What?
Stan: [takes off his laurel] I’m not the reincarnation of L. Ron Hubbard. And… Scientology is just a big fat global scam.
Brian: Oh! We are gonna sue you!
Stan: What??
COS President: Yeah, you think you can say our religion is a lie?! We’ll sue you, buddy!
Stan: YOU told me it was a lie!
President: Ho, now you’re puttin’ words in MY mouth! You are sooo sued!
Man 3: You can’t make fun of Scientology, kid! We are gonna sue your ass AND your balls!
Crowd: Yeah, that’s right!
COS President: How dare you mock our faith, you little punk?! You’ll be hearing from our lawyers tomorrow!
Field Reporter: We’ve just had an incredible development here, Mitch. Tom Cruise, John Travolta, and R. Kelly, have all come out of the closet! [The three of them come out the front door and Cruise releases R. Kelly, who moves off and out of view.]
Cruise: [approaches Stan] So you’re NOT the prophet, huh?! You made me look stupid! I’m gonna sue you too!
Stan: Well fine! Go ahead and sue me!
Cruise: I will! I’ll sue you in England!
COS President: You are so sued, kid!
Stan: Well go on, then! Sue me!
COS President: We’re going to!
Stan: Okay, good! Do it! I’m not scared of you! Sue me!

This one episode caused the loss of a beloved character, almost ruined their contract with Comedy Central, and nearly catapulted them into a lawsuit with Tom Cruise, all of which SP predicted would happen, and yet they decided to forge along anyways in the name of free speech.  Kudos South Park, kudos.

Up next week is Part 2: Christianity

Adapting to Modern Scientology PR Warfare: The Soundbites

Wednesday, May 28th, 2008

Co-evolution is a regular part of any struggle. Each side vies to always be ready for what the other side is going to throw at them, while always staying one step ahead of the adversary so as to leave them in a state of defensive impotence. The result: a bi-directional game of cat and mouse where expedient and effective internal communication and external intelligence-collecting are of absolutely critical importance.

The war between the Cult of Scientology and its critics is primarily a war of information. The critics are working to inform as many people as possible of the very real dangers and abuses of this genuinely malevolent sinister cult which has apparently managed to hijack the minds of many well-meaning people. The cult is trying and usually failing to stop protests and to paint the protesters as a homogeneous cohesive body of bigotry, hate and terrorism. They have played the religion card and the Hitler/KKK card, largely unsuccessfully. They have avoided giving detailed interviews and where they have – i.e., Tommy Davis’ recent CNN appearance – they have engaged in blatant lying and platitudinal say-nothingisms. They have also engaged in their honed intimidation tactic of aggressive shutter-buggery of protesters, having Sci-plants masquerade as protesters in order to attempt to gather protester information and to incite illegal activities which could in turn be blamed on the entire protest movement, lurking and trolling on protest forums, websites and blogs, publishing the names of individual anonymous critics, pursuing frivolous legal and criminal action against protesters, and having YouTube and Google impede the online communication of protesters.

On the other hand, the protesters have engaged in setting up mass communication networks across the Internet, aggressively publishing/posting on the unethical practices of the cult, engaging in many protests with participation ranging from a handful to hundreds, distributing and posting fliers, flooding YouTube with critical and expository videos, alerting the media, letter-writing campaigns, occasionally clicking Scientology ads because they know it will cost the cult money, promoting leading critical sites (e.g., Xenu.Net, ExScientologyKids.Com, GlossLip.Com), and tightly binding on an international scale to rail against the cult’s aggressive and unwarranted legal/criminal action and harassment of protesters. This, of course, is in addition to more cunning methods like Google Bombing (i.e., exploiting the Google algorithms so as to make the first site return for “Scientology” Xenu.Net, and Scientology.Org for “cult”), and now out-right shunned methods like Scientology website-crashing, black faxing and prank phone calls. These latter methods were the norm back in the first 1-2 weeks of the Anonymous backlash, but were abandoned on the thoughtful advice of Mark “Wise Beard Man” Bunker in favour of grassroots online and street activism.

A YouTuber has released a video claiming to expose another Scientology attack strategy: manufacturing soundbites. In this video, it is claimed that Scientologists are looking to engage protesters in interviews in which leading questions are asked so as to elicit responses in which they call Scientology a religion, speak of negative behaviours committed by Anonymous protesters, and make other remarks which Scientology can use in its propaganda media. It is important to be aware of this subtle and cunning approach so that people can be wary and watch how they phrase their responses to questions regarding Scientology and not comply with the framing of leading questions. Put simply: do not let the questioner control the discussion. If they are framing the issue inappropriately, reframe and then respond.