
Dr. Terese Hart is a scientist and conservationist. She has spent over 30 years in the Congo where many significant events of her life have taken place. There she met her husband (Dr. John Hart) and gave birth to two of her three daughters. Under the support of New York Zoological Society, together they studied many aspects of the Ituri Forest, including the uses of it’s pharmacological contents, the socio-economic impact of human migrations, and most famously, the Okapi. While there, she helped setup a Research and Training Center that eventually led to the Okapi Wildlife Reserve (a world heritage site.) She also briefly served as the director of the Wildlife Conservation Society-Congo out of Kinshasa.
Some of the Hart’s time in the Ituri Forest was spent with the Bambutis, among whom was our favorite – Kenge. A documentary available at Google Video, Hearts of Brightness, describes their time there and work studying the Okapi (link at the bottom).
Currently, she is involved in a new project known as TL2 where she leads operations as the coordinator. I got a chance to ask her some questions last week while she’s visiting the States. Below are her replies.
What have you been doing with your time since leaving the WCS-C?I along with my husband, John, who also left WCS and a group of other people we have worked with over the years are exploring a new area of DR Congo with the objective of creating a protected area. The area we call TL2 for the three rivers of central DR Congo: Tshuapa, Lomami and Lualaba. Details here: http://www.bonoboincongo.com/
Why did you decide to leave?
Some new people in NY. A new concept of WCS-Congo – no longer the place for me.
[New York is WCS-central]
WCS grew a great deal since my husband and I joined (mid 80s). Its funding also changed from the private donations of generous and non-demanding NY wealth to short term agency donations or grants that required proposals and reports. The direction in NY grew and had its own needs and own desires for “making sense” of its international program. Result: much less freedom for opportunistic or grass-roots conservation growth…something we felt was essential in a country where lawless rebels and conservation compete for the same land.
Do you still spend time in the Congo?
Eight to ten months a year where I am director of the TL2 Project. I am in the USA this month as my middle daughter becomes a mom (and John and I grandparents).
Tell us more about the TL2 project. I understand yourself, your husband and your colleagues are working to track down Bonobos and Okapis. How exactly do you find these creatures?
We have just moved to this website: http://www.bonoboincongo.com/about-us/
We are talking about hundreds and hundreds of km in dug-out and on-foot. We use signs (dung, nests, feeding sign) and sometimes we are delighted to actually see bonobo and okapi in their forest. The fear is that bushmeat hunting will take them out before they are adequately protected…already there are large areas of “empty” forest.
What is your day to day work like (within this project)? Is it a lot of surveying and cataloging?
We work as a team (again look at website). My own role includes information and political facilitation…this is really fascinating because political facilitation means everything from a small village to national ministries.
What are some of your most vivid memories of your years in Africa?
a) Vivid and frightening – our 6 week old daughter almost died (1982) of bronchitis..can’t mention this without heart felt thanks to mission hospital in Nyankunde (destroyed recently in Hema-Lendu wars) and the Mission Aviation Fellowship.
b) Vivid and frightening – our girls’ teacher (an ex-peace corps worker) attacked by crocodile when bathing with my daughters. She lost her arm but survived. Extremely tough and brave woman.
c) Vivid and awe inspiring – putting a radio collar on an okapi in a pit.
d) Vivid, awe inspiring and frightening – coming face to face with elephant around a corner on a narrow forest trail.
Do you have any fond memories of Kenge?
I could not have done my PhD without Kenge. He was very bright and very articulate. He would grasp what was needed and make it happen. “You need to distinguish between related species? Ok – look at these characters.” “You need the flowers of that canopy tree? OK- we will climb it.” “You need to see a different kind of forest? Well lets go, it will take a day to get there, bring lots of food.” He had a great sense of humor, would understate the obvious, and make fun of us along with everyone else.
And he was genuinely fond of us. He would unexpectedly give us wonderful gifts. This might sound odd as an example: but once he went out alone hunting and killed an okapi with a spear; it was a very big event. He did it for his daughter’s “coming out”. That evening he quietly brought us the most choice and significant part of the carcass – the full udder.
But Kenge was an alcoholic and that was always a problem between us. As the years went on it became a bigger problem and I as had more people working on projects we could not overlook his being late or absent on account of drunkenness. He tried casting out the demons of alcoholism traditionally. He tried swearing off. But it never worked…and he would drink the most fearsome of local brews.
Do/did the dangers of living in rebel territories deter you?
I have rarely felt personally threatened….Although we have fled (to avoid being threatened) a couple of times.
Care to speculate on the future of African civil wars?
Sigh – no I don’t want to speculate. Conservation has to be strong enough with wide enough support to work in a wide variety of situations; otherwise extinction is just waiting for the first political slip up.
What is a solution?
For conservation it is obviously not just good enough to have the national gov’t proclaim a protected area, there has to be local support and support by the land holding ethnic group and by both the powerless and the powerful. Just last year when one ethnic group worked to create a protected area in another (rival) ethnic group’s area, several groups of bonobo which had survived close to villages disappeared and conservationists were run out of a village. That is conservation gone wrong.
How passionate or apathetic are the average locals of their natural heritage?
That is very variable. Some of the strongest conservation feelings come when outside groups (foresters, mining companies, rival groups (see above)…) want to exploit a forest that traditionally belonged to a local group. Conservation has to be able to use this sense of local pride and ownership if it is going to be successful.
How has formal conservation changed through the decades?
I can only speak from my own experience within one group (WCS). It went from allowing a great deal of autonomy to individual researchers/conservationists to attempting to build a centrally controlled organization. I think that most big organizations are similar. Small organizations have more flexibility – and can generally be closer to the ground and respond more quickly to needs and changing situations.
Is there any particular aspect of it that you don’t like?
Any part of conservation I don’t like? Watching slow (or rapid) declines in animal populations and not being able to effectively counter it in even a small area….That can be for any or several of many different reasons….
There is a certain amount of turf-protecting that happens in Conservation. Sometimes it is best to allow one vision and one organization to get things underway. Where we have seen things go wrong is where a big conservation organization is “taken for a ride”. They accept without critical evaluation what a local “entrepreneur” posing as “their conservationist” tells them is being carried out on the ground. All good for society publicity, but an area becomes off-limits, and results highly suspect.
There are no schools of conservation, yet a larger fighting force is needed. What do you propose is a way to attract attention?
Conservation needs allies in science, journalism, and politics. I don’t think that it needs schools but rather classes in all schools and champions in all walks of life. It needs more air time, print space, etc.
The gorilla massacre of 2007, where were you?
I was in Kinshasa
Do you/did you have any personal suspicions in the case?
I knew that there were some very negative people in positions of power that affected conservation. I think that the Nat Geo article was quite good. There are some excellent people working for conservation in Goma…absolutely top rate. But these are often fighting a battle against forces strengthened by the continuing war.
North America is rife with green fads such as the use of cloth grocery bags, and fluorescent light bulbs? Is this a really a solution? If not, what more needs to be done?
If people individually reduce their impact on the environment – it is a good thing. But many environment problems must be addressed globally and we must figure out ways for people who are able to make their small environmental contribution at home to make a small environmental contribution in other places around the globe with the same certainty of a true impact as when they personally only use cloth grocery bags. I am not only talking about global warming or other huge global phenomena but also local impacts such as deforestation or commercial bushmeat hunting in a country with a very poor population unlikely to be able to save its own resources unaided.
Ultimately, the power over nature lies in the hands of large economies and militaries. Can we transform the way these operate?
Well we have to try, don’t we?
What’s it like to step down in Kinshasa, and visit a gorilla reserve for a first timer? Is it really as idealistic as we might imagine or is it commercialized by now?
At this time very little is successfully commercialized for tourists in DR Congo. Gorilla viewing more than other activities but the experience is still very raw. Wonderfully so, I think. You almost certainly won’t step down in Kinshasa though if you are gorilla viewing but rather enter the Congo from the east (ie enter Goma to visit the gorillas of Virunga Nat Park or enter Bukavu to visit gorillas in Kahuzi Biega Nat Park. These are not the only parks or places with the gorillas but they are the only places where habituation has occurred)
To what extent has the forest cover reduced in the recent decades?
Varies in different areas (very little in the TL2 where we are working). Some good studies happening using satellite imagery (WRI and CARPE…)
All unreal expectations and hopes aside, where do you think will we be in 50 years time?
My hope, and I feel that it is possible, is that there will be a large and effective conservation area in the TL2 area of Congo. To think larger than what I am immediately working on is hard….. I do feel generally that we have to work area by area and we have to craft our efforts such that any success will be an important success and that there will not be large wasted efforts.
So there you have it, straight from the horse’s mouth. We hear so much about all the politics and adventures behind conservation, so I feel very privileged to hear what happens behind the scenes from a person with such experience. I thank Dr. Hart for answering these questions for us and putting up with a noob interviewer, and offer her and her husband congrats on becoming grandparents!
** References
Hearts of Brightness – Google Video
NatGeo Article on the Virunga Massacre
Pursuing The Eradication of Faith
Monday, January 5th, 2009Whilst this has a bold title, the actual implications are mundane. Here at The Edger, we are in the process of assimilating the direct goals, discourse and method of various secular humanist enterprises. We wage war with approaches and two-pronged forks end up bleeding in one’s hands. Such is the dealings when it comes to ideas. And one idea which seems to sent quivers down the spines of spineless people is the eradication of faith.
Consider this recent comment from perhaps my favourite Chris Ray post. This is Comment #25, from BluffingtonBoast:
Not only is this insulting, saying we have “no moral compass”, it is also patently bizarre.
As many know, I find the term “atheist” unhelpful. We are all atheists but specifically Bluffington has focused on the god of the old testament as somehow more special than other gods. As if the god of the Bible is more reasonable or believable than Thor. I would speculate that Bluffington does not believe in Thor or Filli Mukullu, so he or she is also an atheist. His or her lack of belief in Thor is also responsible for the deaths and so on that the apologist sides love to bring up, in some sick blood-thirsty satisfaction. Yet somehow the nonbelievers in one particular group’s god is er more responsible than the nonbelievers in the other gods… IF you’re confused, then welcome to my club. It makes no sense to say atheist caused this or that, because we are all atheists.
I also find the word “humanist” unhelpful and do not call myself that (now at least). Regardless, let us question this fact further: Do BluffingtonBoast and others honestly believe that The Edger readers are going to murder, pillage and destroy churches, mosques and temples? And what of the excellent writers at Edger, who constantly talk about equality, liberty, justice and beauty – without the usurpation of religious bigotry to underpin such ideas to the blackboard of dogmatic truth. Whilst promoting such important (not even good) ideas, how is it that with a second blink they would destroy, hurt or promote destruction?
BluffintonBoast has set up a false dichotomy: either there is religion, with people tolerating it and being respectful or there is no religion which is brought about through destruction and pillaging. But that’s not true. Chemistry “eradicated” alchemy, astronomy “replaced” astrology – yet, were chemists grabbing their bottles of acid and tossing them into the homes of alchemists? Were astronomers taking their telescopes and bashing the heads of “seers” and their crystal balls? Of course not. That is patently absurd and an insult to human sensibility if one considers it as such.
The growth of ideas is simply the coming to fruition of budding knowledge. Old ideas and world-views, like astrology and religion, once shaded our eyes as we gazed into the beautiful, mad world around us. But soon, from the same roots as astrology and religion, arose better and more lucid ideas. The ideas we call astronomy and humanism. These grew higher and we could climb and see more of the world. But religion and astrology, blocked by the growing forms of these better ideas, should wither and fade back into the soil of the human past. But there are those who vilify and feed these old plants, keeping them alive, turning them into weeds. They crawl along the bark of these new ideas, trying to gain the light and pulling these better ideas down.
So when those of us who selected from the Mickey Mouse poll to “actively pursue this”, what do we mean? Our words are the length of our armory. Religion can be replaced by promoting better ideas and not respecting the ideas – forget the people, the ideas are what we are dealing with – of religion. We do not have to. So if we mock, chide and dismiss foggy notions of talking burning bushes and blood thirsty gods, it is not a precursor to destroying churches. I love churches, I love mosques and temples. I remove my shoes when I enter, I pray at friends houses when they ask me to. I respect the people but not the ideas.
Not only is it insulting to suggest we desire blood, it is a complete misunderstanding. As chemistry replaced alchemy, so will the wonder of the present moment, the beauty of science, and the love of fellow humans replace religion. It will eradicate faith. I doubt it will ever happen, but yes, Bluffington and others, I do plan on actively seeking that goal.
Tags: alchemy, Astrology, atheism, chemistry, dogma, eradication, Humanism, religion, science
Posted in Commentary | 1 Comment »