If you’ve actually read the bible then you know that contradictions appear more than Jesus on toast, yet it’s not often you see a strident believer standing on a soapbox and preaching the gospel of contradiction. Instead, he’ll preach that it’s literal truth, or at least that it’s a bunch of helpful metaphors. Either way you swing it, be it that truth and contradictions only work together when defining ‘oxymoron’, or that a metaphor that contradicts with another metaphor isn’t necessarily the best way to compare things, the bible is only as helpful as the eyes of those who colour it.
So i’ve taken it upon myself – with the help of your friendly neighborhood contradiction preachers – to paint this town red and give you the five best glaring contradictions from the bible, with some modern equivalents to put the proverbial cherry on top.
1. Animal before man? Or man before animal?
So we all know the story…Adam is lonelier than a prepubescent WOW addict so God brings him some animals to name.
The Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him. Now the Lord God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. [Genesis 18-19]
What the preachers of contradiction have to say about it:
Modern equivalent:
Moderator: Senator McCain, are Americans better off than they were 8 years ago?
McCain: I think you could argue that Americans overall are better off.
Reporter: Senator, you do not believe we are better off by any means than we were 8 years ago
McCain: Oh no…no. (assuredly).
2. Two animals? Or seven animals?
So God didn’t know if he created man or animal first. So what, we all have brain burps once and awhile. Surely he must have understood how many animals needed to be put on Noahs ark for them to procreate and once again populate the earth… right? Two seems reasonable…
You are to bring into the ark two of all living creatures, male and female, to keep them alive with you. Two of every kind of bird, of every kind of animal and of every kind of creature that moves along the ground will come to you to be kept alive. [Genesis 6:19]
What the preachers of contradiction have to say about it:
Modern equivalent:
McCain: We let spending get completely out of control. Of course those tax cuts have to remain perminent.
McCain: I voted against the tax cuts
McCain; I voted to extend them
McCain: I voted against the tax cut
McCain: I’ve always been for tax cuts
3. It is finished? Or Father, into your hands I commend my spirit?
God didn’t have the greatest track record through the old testament. It was violent, barbaric, and nationalistic. “No wonder it had contradictions,” you say. “It was so clearly written by man.”…Right?
What you really mean, to take the words right out of Anne Coulter’s mouth, is that the New Testament corrected the Old Testament, contradictions and all. Unfortunately, the writers of the NT weren’t any less prone to human folly than those who wrote the OT.
According to the way most people contrast the OT and NT, one could reasonably expect Jesus’ last words to be something along the lines of “God, I hath forsaken your Old Testament,” or “Father, I know you were drunk when you wrote the Old Testament. I’m honoured to have corrected your mistakes.”
Instead Jesus said this:
Jesus called out with a loud voice, “Father, into your hands I commend my spirit.” When he had said this, he breathed his last. [Luke 23:46]
What the preachers of contradiction have to say about it:
Modern equivalent:
Moderator: Senator McCain, you have said repeatedly quote “I know alot less about economics than I do about military informed policy issues. I still need to be educated.
McCain: Actually, I don’t know where you got that quote from.
McCain: I’ve got to convince people because of my extensive background on the economy and knowledge.
McCain: I don’t have that kind of expertise to know whether exactly he has cut interest rates sufficiently or not.
4. Simon of Cyrene? Or Jesus of Nazareth?
Contradictions aside, the story of Jesus’ crucifixion is stupefyingly mortifying. They beat him, lashed him, cut him, stuck a ring of thorns around his head, and then made him carry the very device upon which he would die…
So the soldiers took charge of Jesus. Carrying his own cross, he went out to the place of the Skull. Here they crucified him…[John 19:17-18]
What the preachers of contradiction have to say about it:
Modern equivalent:
McCain: Neither party should be defined by pandering to the outreaches of American politics and the agents of intolerance whether they be Lewis Farrakhan or Al Sharpton on the left or Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell on the right.
Reporter: Do you believe that Jerry Falwell is still an agent of intolerance?
McCain: No I don’t
5. Judas committed suicide? Or Judas fell?
Now imagine you’re Judas. Jesus is dead, and you ratted him out. In other words, you narked out the one and only son of God – the one who was sent here to die for the sins of all mankind. Surely that must weigh heavy on your conscience. It only follows that you’re first option might be to just off yourself…
So Judas thew the money into the temple and left. Then he went away and hanged himself. [Matthew 27:5]
What the preachers of contradiction have to say about it:
Modern equivalent:
McCain: We either keep our word or we don’t keep our word. I intend to keep my word to the American people.
Me: See aforementioned contradictions.
* All biblical quotations are from the New International Version (NIV)





Responses to common Christian apologetic claims
Monday, October 27th, 2008The Bible says the Earth is unsupported. (Job 26:7)
This is perhaps one of the best pick-and-choose Christian arguments, in which they single out a few Biblical verses that seemingly support modern science. Christians who make this claim seem to have forgotten to include certain verses (Job 38:4-6) which clearly state that the earth has foundations. This is in exact contradiction to the fact that the earth is unsupported. It even directly contradicts the earlier verse that Christians use to claim that the Earth is unsupported. Anyone seeking to reconcile the Biblical view to the modern scientific view certainly has more than enough passages to select from and interpret; while ignoring others that make the Bible sound like nothing more than a primitive attempt at understanding the world.
The Bible describes the water cycle in astounding detail. (Ecclesiastes 1:7)
Astounding detail? This is what the verse says:
“All streams flow into the sea, yet the sea is never full. To the place the streams come from, there they return again.”
What is so astounding about that? The verse merely says that water returns to the source of the streams. It doesn’t mention anything about condensation or evaporation. This is merely wishful thinking on the part of anyone who deceives themselves into thinking that some sort of divine revelation happened here.
The Bible says the earth is round. (Isaiah 40:22)
The verse reads “He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth”. A circle is flat and without any volume (in contrast to a sphere). Newsflash: A circle and a sphere are not the same things. Isaiah 11:12 refers to the ‘four corners of the earth’. Why don’t mainstream Christians take that as the indicator of the earth’s shape? Telling, isn’t it?
The Bible has always proven to be factually correct.
Are these verses factually correct in light of modern science?
Leviticus 11:6- Rabbits chew their cud and have hooves.
Leviticus 11:20-23- Insects are four-legged, e.g. grasshoppers.
Do I need to go on?
The Bible is historically correct and consistent.
Really? Well, that must be news because as far as I know, Matthew 1:16 and Luke 3:23 cannot even agree regarding Jesus’ lineage. There are also historical records found in China, Egypt, etc. that show life going on normally during the exact time the global flood was alleged to have taken place. For a flood of such epic proportions, something stinks to high heaven (pardon the pun) here.
The Bible is reasonable.
Reasonable? Let’s take a look at Genesis 30:37-39. Did anyone tell you that shoving striped rods in front of animals causes them to have striped offspring? God really needs to learn a thing or two about basic genetics, don’t you think?
In Numbers 22:2-29, Balaam doesn’t seem the least bit surprised to discover that his donkey could suddenly speak. I suppose this must be because stuff like that used to happen every day in Biblical times although the Christian god has become strangely silent now.
Wait, all this is supposed to be reasonable? My bad.
Sorry, Christian apologists. You need to try harder next time.
Tags: apologetics, atheism, bible, christianity
Posted in Commentary | 22 Comments »