That Ian Bushfield is one angry atheist.
He’s such a fundamentalist, with his belief that God doesn’t exist.
He’s so militant, writing words in a campus newspaper rather than taking up arms or violence.
He’s so arrogant, suggesting we should test ideas against the real world before accepting them.
He’s so intolerant, speaking out when we want him to shut up.
He’s so evangelical, wanting people to question their beliefs, regardless of what they may be.
He’s so Utopian, hoping for a better world.
He’s such a progressive liberal-leftist, even though he hasn’t written about politics or economics yet.
He’s so ignorant, for not accepting or understanding every nuance of my religion.
He’s so immature, clearly belief in God is sophisticated endeavour.
He’s so immoral, I mean, how can you really be good without someone watching over you?
He’s so self-centred, because he doesn’t think God talks to him personally.
He’s so nihilistic, for thinking that for him since life ends at death, he should value every moment he has alive.
He’s so communistic, since he clearly worships the state above his fellow human being.
He’s so angry, because he has to put up with intolerant jerks like us.
God loves you,
Anonymous Christian Student
Standard response to an atheist article
Friday, October 10th, 2008To save Christians the time in writing original responses to articles written by atheists, I’ve taken the time to compile a basic template that any fundamentalist could use to respond to these sorts of articles. I figure it’s a sign of good faith (puns always intended).
(Adapted from my blog Terahertz)
Tags: articles, atheist, characterization, christian, fundamentalist, letter, opinions, stereotypes
Posted in Commentary | No Comments »