Watch this video. Just watch it. Kindgartners think Africa is a country. Now that Palin has lost maybe she’ll return to the sandbox, build some sand castles, play some kickball, and drink some kool-aid.
Posts Tagged ‘Africa’
The Old Africa is a Country Mistake…by an “Almost” Vice President
Thursday, November 6th, 2008Out of Africa (another route)
Tuesday, October 14th, 2008A study published in the PNAS journal (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) notes the discovery of another possible ancient river. This body of water would have flown from the middle of the Sahara desert, through Libya, to the Mediterranean Sea. A so called ‘central Saharan watershed’ is a range of volcanic mountains from where the river would have flown. It is also thought that the region northwards from here would have been much wetter, going thorough more cycles of rain than the present Sahara. This discovery also opens up another possibility of the route our ancestors might have taken out of Africa.
Even with sophisticated modern all-terrain vehicles, the Sahara is considered a treacherous drive. A hike remains out of question for most. So until now it was a little difficult to practically explain how a band of proto-sapiens would have trekked these thousands of kilometers. The Nile has always been thought of as that lender of life that allowed them to carry on. While the current discovery does not defeat the previous possibility, it certainly presents another viable alternative.
I can’t help but imagine the scene, where after generations of traveling, a small group of our ancestors must have found themselves facing the new sea – boundless water. To anyone who has not seen a large lake, sea or ocean before, the first view is usually breathtakingly stunning. What this group must have felt like on discovery of such a rich new ecosystem is probably one of those things we’ll never know in our lifetimes.
But perhaps I’m exaggerating. The Nile delta as it is today looks as fertile as a thick forest through satellite imagery. Most likely the trail the proto-sapiens followed was also much richer than we can imagine. And most of it did take place during a glaciation period. But still, like those of us who don’t live in coastal cities or towns can testify, a huge difference exists between the two.
The study was conducted by researchers from the universities of Bristol, Southampton, Oxford, Hull and Tripoli. The original Bristol press release can be found @ http://www.bristol.ac.uk/news/2008/5947.html.
An interview with Dr. Terese Hart
Wednesday, September 10th, 2008
Dr. Terese Hart is a scientist and conservationist. She has spent over 30 years in the Congo where many significant events of her life have taken place. There she met her husband (Dr. John Hart) and gave birth to two of her three daughters. Under the support of New York Zoological Society, together they studied many aspects of the Ituri Forest, including the uses of it’s pharmacological contents, the socio-economic impact of human migrations, and most famously, the Okapi. While there, she helped setup a Research and Training Center that eventually led to the Okapi Wildlife Reserve (a world heritage site.) She also briefly served as the director of the Wildlife Conservation Society-Congo out of Kinshasa.
Some of the Hart’s time in the Ituri Forest was spent with the Bambutis, among whom was our favorite – Kenge. A documentary available at Google Video, Hearts of Brightness, describes their time there and work studying the Okapi (link at the bottom).
Currently, she is involved in a new project known as TL2 where she leads operations as the coordinator. I got a chance to ask her some questions last week while she’s visiting the States. Below are her replies.
What have you been doing with your time since leaving the WCS-C?I along with my husband, John, who also left WCS and a group of other people we have worked with over the years are exploring a new area of DR Congo with the objective of creating a protected area. The area we call TL2 for the three rivers of central DR Congo: Tshuapa, Lomami and Lualaba. Details here: http://www.bonoboincongo.com/
Why did you decide to leave?
Some new people in NY. A new concept of WCS-Congo – no longer the place for me.
[New York is WCS-central]
WCS grew a great deal since my husband and I joined (mid 80s). Its funding also changed from the private donations of generous and non-demanding NY wealth to short term agency donations or grants that required proposals and reports. The direction in NY grew and had its own needs and own desires for “making sense” of its international program. Result: much less freedom for opportunistic or grass-roots conservation growth…something we felt was essential in a country where lawless rebels and conservation compete for the same land.
Do you still spend time in the Congo?
Eight to ten months a year where I am director of the TL2 Project. I am in the USA this month as my middle daughter becomes a mom (and John and I grandparents).
Tell us more about the TL2 project. I understand yourself, your husband and your colleagues are working to track down Bonobos and Okapis. How exactly do you find these creatures?
We have just moved to this website: http://www.bonoboincongo.com/about-us/
We are talking about hundreds and hundreds of km in dug-out and on-foot. We use signs (dung, nests, feeding sign) and sometimes we are delighted to actually see bonobo and okapi in their forest. The fear is that bushmeat hunting will take them out before they are adequately protected…already there are large areas of “empty” forest.
What is your day to day work like (within this project)? Is it a lot of surveying and cataloging?
We work as a team (again look at website). My own role includes information and political facilitation…this is really fascinating because political facilitation means everything from a small village to national ministries.
What are some of your most vivid memories of your years in Africa?
a) Vivid and frightening – our 6 week old daughter almost died (1982) of bronchitis..can’t mention this without heart felt thanks to mission hospital in Nyankunde (destroyed recently in Hema-Lendu wars) and the Mission Aviation Fellowship.
b) Vivid and frightening – our girls’ teacher (an ex-peace corps worker) attacked by crocodile when bathing with my daughters. She lost her arm but survived. Extremely tough and brave woman.
c) Vivid and awe inspiring – putting a radio collar on an okapi in a pit.
d) Vivid, awe inspiring and frightening – coming face to face with elephant around a corner on a narrow forest trail.
Do you have any fond memories of Kenge?
I could not have done my PhD without Kenge. He was very bright and very articulate. He would grasp what was needed and make it happen. “You need to distinguish between related species? Ok – look at these characters.” “You need the flowers of that canopy tree? OK- we will climb it.” “You need to see a different kind of forest? Well lets go, it will take a day to get there, bring lots of food.” He had a great sense of humor, would understate the obvious, and make fun of us along with everyone else.
And he was genuinely fond of us. He would unexpectedly give us wonderful gifts. This might sound odd as an example: but once he went out alone hunting and killed an okapi with a spear; it was a very big event. He did it for his daughter’s “coming out”. That evening he quietly brought us the most choice and significant part of the carcass – the full udder.
But Kenge was an alcoholic and that was always a problem between us. As the years went on it became a bigger problem and I as had more people working on projects we could not overlook his being late or absent on account of drunkenness. He tried casting out the demons of alcoholism traditionally. He tried swearing off. But it never worked…and he would drink the most fearsome of local brews.
Do/did the dangers of living in rebel territories deter you?
I have rarely felt personally threatened….Although we have fled (to avoid being threatened) a couple of times.
Care to speculate on the future of African civil wars?
Sigh – no I don’t want to speculate. Conservation has to be strong enough with wide enough support to work in a wide variety of situations; otherwise extinction is just waiting for the first political slip up.
What is a solution?
For conservation it is obviously not just good enough to have the national gov’t proclaim a protected area, there has to be local support and support by the land holding ethnic group and by both the powerless and the powerful. Just last year when one ethnic group worked to create a protected area in another (rival) ethnic group’s area, several groups of bonobo which had survived close to villages disappeared and conservationists were run out of a village. That is conservation gone wrong.
How passionate or apathetic are the average locals of their natural heritage?
That is very variable. Some of the strongest conservation feelings come when outside groups (foresters, mining companies, rival groups (see above)…) want to exploit a forest that traditionally belonged to a local group. Conservation has to be able to use this sense of local pride and ownership if it is going to be successful.
How has formal conservation changed through the decades?
I can only speak from my own experience within one group (WCS). It went from allowing a great deal of autonomy to individual researchers/conservationists to attempting to build a centrally controlled organization. I think that most big organizations are similar. Small organizations have more flexibility – and can generally be closer to the ground and respond more quickly to needs and changing situations.
Is there any particular aspect of it that you don’t like?
Any part of conservation I don’t like? Watching slow (or rapid) declines in animal populations and not being able to effectively counter it in even a small area….That can be for any or several of many different reasons….
There is a certain amount of turf-protecting that happens in Conservation. Sometimes it is best to allow one vision and one organization to get things underway. Where we have seen things go wrong is where a big conservation organization is “taken for a ride”. They accept without critical evaluation what a local “entrepreneur” posing as “their conservationist” tells them is being carried out on the ground. All good for society publicity, but an area becomes off-limits, and results highly suspect.
There are no schools of conservation, yet a larger fighting force is needed. What do you propose is a way to attract attention?
Conservation needs allies in science, journalism, and politics. I don’t think that it needs schools but rather classes in all schools and champions in all walks of life. It needs more air time, print space, etc.
The gorilla massacre of 2007, where were you?
I was in Kinshasa
Do you/did you have any personal suspicions in the case?
I knew that there were some very negative people in positions of power that affected conservation. I think that the Nat Geo article was quite good. There are some excellent people working for conservation in Goma…absolutely top rate. But these are often fighting a battle against forces strengthened by the continuing war.
North America is rife with green fads such as the use of cloth grocery bags, and fluorescent light bulbs? Is this a really a solution? If not, what more needs to be done?
If people individually reduce their impact on the environment – it is a good thing. But many environment problems must be addressed globally and we must figure out ways for people who are able to make their small environmental contribution at home to make a small environmental contribution in other places around the globe with the same certainty of a true impact as when they personally only use cloth grocery bags. I am not only talking about global warming or other huge global phenomena but also local impacts such as deforestation or commercial bushmeat hunting in a country with a very poor population unlikely to be able to save its own resources unaided.
Ultimately, the power over nature lies in the hands of large economies and militaries. Can we transform the way these operate?
Well we have to try, don’t we?
What’s it like to step down in Kinshasa, and visit a gorilla reserve for a first timer? Is it really as idealistic as we might imagine or is it commercialized by now?
At this time very little is successfully commercialized for tourists in DR Congo. Gorilla viewing more than other activities but the experience is still very raw. Wonderfully so, I think. You almost certainly won’t step down in Kinshasa though if you are gorilla viewing but rather enter the Congo from the east (ie enter Goma to visit the gorillas of Virunga Nat Park or enter Bukavu to visit gorillas in Kahuzi Biega Nat Park. These are not the only parks or places with the gorillas but they are the only places where habituation has occurred)
To what extent has the forest cover reduced in the recent decades?
Varies in different areas (very little in the TL2 where we are working). Some good studies happening using satellite imagery (WRI and CARPE…)
All unreal expectations and hopes aside, where do you think will we be in 50 years time?
My hope, and I feel that it is possible, is that there will be a large and effective conservation area in the TL2 area of Congo. To think larger than what I am immediately working on is hard….. I do feel generally that we have to work area by area and we have to craft our efforts such that any success will be an important success and that there will not be large wasted efforts.
So there you have it, straight from the horse’s mouth. We hear so much about all the politics and adventures behind conservation, so I feel very privileged to hear what happens behind the scenes from a person with such experience. I thank Dr. Hart for answering these questions for us and putting up with a noob interviewer, and offer her and her husband congrats on becoming grandparents!
** References
Africans told to be more Christian
Wednesday, August 13th, 2008Clearly the solution to starvation, poverty and AIDS in Africa is more prayer. Or at least that’s what Matthew Kyei, National President of the Rosicrucian Fellowship of Ghana says.
He expressed worry that even though Christianity was introduced into Ghana many years back, crime and sin continues to plague the society.
…
He said despite the existence of Christianity in Africa, the continent lagged behind in development and attributed this to selfishness, fear, animism, brutalities and moral degradation instead of worshipping God in faith and in deed.
I’m pretty sure a good ol’ dose of sceptical rationality is what they need, not further intellectual road blocks.
From the Frontlines of Conservation
Thursday, September 4th, 2008In one of my earlier posts, I had made a reference to Virunga National Park – a 7800 square kilometer reserve of the Congolese jungle. Virunga is home to the critically endangered mountain gorillas (MGs), and also to the ongoing Congo civil wars. The BBC just released an article that describes the events that occurred following the famous gorilla massacre from last year.
Starting from the very top, in June of 2007, two female MGs were discovered dead – one shot execution style, the other missing but presumed dead. It was clear the attack had been made by rebels in the area, who even today make a habit of threatening conservationists and conservation-able alike. This outrage was followed by jaw-dropping hysteria when in the following month, five more MGs were found dead.
On July 23rd, Mburanumwe, Neza, and Safari, three female MGs, were found lying dead in the trees. The next day, the body of Senkwekwe – the patriarch of the Rugendo family, also shot through the chest, was found. Another body, that of Macibiri was discovered a few weeks later. The shock these killings brought in the international community were just as pronounced as the grief of the local rangers who knew these famous gorillas intimately. In the same summer, another 3 gorillas would die.
Investigations found and convicted Honore Mashagiro, a park ranger, as the mastermind of the massacre. He had allegedly done all this to deter conservationists who were involved in saving the animal habitats. You see, along with diamond mining and poaching, another one of Africa’s lucrative underground trades is charcoal production. Trees are cut down and then “smoked” to produce charcoal which is always in demand in war-torn villages. It is used for primarily for cooking and heating by those who have no electricity or permanent homes. Just another way in which war directly affects the environment.
Anyhow, the conservationists were succeeding in protecting the forests from heavy logging, while the kickbacks Mashagiro earned from his illegal trade were suffering. If he had anything more than half a brain, he might have realized that his actions would only cause an international incident, and scare-off no one; but being the genius that he was, he decided to kill among the most revered of animals on Earth.
As dramatic as these events were, they only highlight a larger pattern in African governments. Park officials, military men, politicians, and other men entrusted with the safety of a country are those causing the most damage. In the time we resolve global politics and find a solution to Africa’s civil wars and poverty, the mountain gorillas, of which only a little over 700 remain, might be gone.
The more recent account of the BBC journalist (who was not named oddly enough) confirms that the problem is of as much imminence at this very moment as it was when the massacres occurred. Since September 2007, rebels have taken control of the area pointing their guns at anyone who enters. Gunfights break out occasionally, just as they did three days ago. Upon hearing these sounds, the humans get scared, and undoubtedly so do the gorillas.
In a late development, the reporter and his/her team recently caught onto a lead of a baby gorilla for sale. They setup a sting operation with the help of local park-rangers ready to make any arrests. On approaching the sellers, they found the baby gorilla to actually be a baby chimp, a fact the sellers did not seem to be aware of. After the arrests were made, it was found the men who our protagonists communicated with were actually middlemen. The owner of the house where the sale was made has been traced to a major in the Congolese army. Indeed a senior position. The BBC is not yet ready to release his name for legal reasons, but surely complex politics will surround the final outcome.
In good news, the reporter tells of the new head of Virunga – Emmanuel de Merode, an apparently capable person, who obviously has a lot on his plate. Let’s hope his reign remains under positive light. We owe a great debt of gratitude to these conservationists who are literally involved in a war. I said my thanks to one I met in the Jim Corbett National Park of India.
In the next few days, I have an interview coming up with Dr. Terese Hart, former director of the Wildlife Conservation Society in Congo. She has also been on of these people, but has also worn the hat of a scientist. Her perspective on the subject should be very interesting. Stay posted.
Further Reading:
BBC Article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7549444.stm
You can catch a documentary of Dr. Hart and her husband studying the Okapi with the help of the Bambuti: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6940493879196053202&ei=HbGoSJSnAYzQ2AKHtYgs&q=hart+of+brightness
More detailed and gruesome pictures of the accident: http://africambiance.org/phpbbv3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5563
Tags: Africa, congo, forest, gorilla, massacre, nature, science
Posted in Commentary | No Comments »