Factonista is an online freethought advocacy organization that relies on its users for content. Through international broad-based collaboration with its users, and other groups and organizations, it strives to provide timely and comprehensive news, views, reviews, and creative multimedia on issues at the forefront of everything under the umbrella of freethought
This is a follow-up to a previous post.
Ever wondered why people supposedly get out of their wheelchairs and run about on stage during a healing crusade; but no one has ever regrown an amputated limb?
There are a few possibilities:
1. God is not omnipotent. Regrowing an amputated limb is beyond what he can do. (Remember, this is the same ‘god’ who flooded the whole earth, parted the Red Sea, created humans from dust, etc). This obviously does not make sense even if you look at it from the theological side.
2. God refuses to regrow limbs due to reasons that we, being humans, are not supposed to comprehend. As the popular apologetic argument goes: We cannot understand god’s ways. Most Christians that I have spoken to love using this cop-out.
However, this runs contrary to the Bible:
(Matthew 7:7) Ask, and it will be given you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. For every one who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened. Or what man of you, if his son asks him for bread, will give him a stone? Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a serpent? If you then, who are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father who is in heaven give good things to those who ask him!
(Matthew 21:21) I tell you the truth, if you have faith and do not doubt, not only can you do what was done to the fig tree, but also you can say to this mountain, ‘Go, throw yourself into the sea,’ and it will be done. If you believe, you will receive whatever you ask for in prayer.
Uh-oh. That argument doesn’t seem to work either.
3. God does not want to be too obvious. He prefers to remain silent and unseen so that people would have no reason to believe in him. In the end, he deliberately sends all the nonbelievers to hell.
4. God is imaginary, and the faith healers are simply deluded or are deliberate charlatans.
You may still wonder why so many people are supposedly ‘cured’? There must still be miracles to account for, right?
Wrong.
1. Some faith healers are plain frauds. Peter Popoff pretended to get messages from god while his wife was whispering through an earpiece backstage. She got her information from cards that the audience filled out when they attended In the incredibly credulous atmosphere of his crusades, the audience fell for it hook, line, and sinker. This fraud was exposed in the 1980’s by James Randi.
2. Some alleged cures have involved mistaken diagnoses that required no cure at all in the first place.
3. Psychosomatic illnesses respond positively to psychological manipulation. This never works in the case of amputated limbs. This is the most logical explanation when we consider psychosomatic illnesses as opposed to amputated limbs.
4. In the excitement of an evangelical revival, the reduction of pain due to the release of endorphins often causes people to believe and act as if they have been miraculously healed (Nickell 1993).
5. The desire to be cured can relieve stress and bring about the effects of the power of suggestion; and testimonies are often exaggerated to please god, the healer, or simply to demonstrate that they are full of faith. Nevertheless, the desire to be cured can sometimes bring adverse effects. One cancer patient at a Kathryn Kuhlman faith-healing performance was asked by Kuhlman to remove her back brace and run across the stage. She claimed her cancer was cured, but then died two months later after X-rays showed that a “cancer-weakened vertebra had collapsed due to the strain placed on it during the demonstration” (Nickell 1998).
6. Some serious ailments (etc. cancer), are unpredictable and may undergo spontaneous remission.
7. Failures are sometimes blamed on the patient for not having enough faith, or too much doubt.
8. Many patients refuse to admit that they have not been cured as they are ashamed that they “lacked faith”.
9. Many cures have been attributed to the placebo effect, not divine intervention.
To fully comprehend the lunacy of faith healers, the following is an excerpt from the transcript of what Benny Hinn said on Paul and Jan Crouch’s TBN television program (Praise The Lord, Trinity Broadcasting Network, October 19, 1999).
[start of excerpt]
Benny Hinn: But here’s first what I see for TBN. You’re going to have people raised from the dead watching this network. You’re going to have people raised from the dead watching TBN. It’s not going to be a Benny Hinn saying “Stretch your hands.” It’s going to be your average teaching program, your normal Christian program that’s blessing the church. There’s going to be such power on these programs people will be raised from the dead worldwide. I’m telling you, I see this in the Spirit. It’s going to be so awesome. Jesus I give you praise for this — that people around the world — maybe not so much in America — people around the world who will lose loved ones, will say to undertakers, “Not yet. I want to take my dead loved one and place him in front of that TV set for 24 hours.”
[end of excerpt]
So far, nobody has been raised from the dead by Benny Hinn or any of the other faith healers. Wouldn’t raising someone from the dead show non-believers that there must be something to this god business after all?
The sad thing about this is that people who are desperate for a cure often put all their trust in the faith healers, and blame themselves for ‘not having enough faith’ when they are not cured. This is the main reason that faith healers are not being called out on their outrageous claims, and in the case of Popoff, for example, people are still falling for his scam even after he was exposed by James Randi. As skeptics, we need to speak out and make our voices heard, at least for the sake of the desperate people conveniently exploited by the faith healers. Humanism calls for it.
tweets loading 
[...] The rest is here: Does faith healing really work? [...]
Amen. To paraphrase my friend Johann Hari, I respect people too much as human beings to let them indulge in delusions – which could ultimately hurt them. We are dealing with this in South Africa at the moment and so far, losing. (People are dying from drinking detergents as advised from traditional healers, instead of consulting doctors).
Does faith healing really work?
The evidence up to this point very strongly suggests it doesn’t! We can obviously never say that faith healing does not work period. Nevertheless, we must go where the evidence, and logic, leads us and both lead to the conclusion that very likely it is bogus.
On the other hand, I would be the very first one that would welcome evidence of God’s existence and that prayer heals. Can you imagine how easy life would become? I guess that’s the sort of comfort that the religious folks get out of it.
Nice work Shalini, very well written indeed!
This faith healing works ;(. Alcoholics Anonymous is a religion where the core focus is faith healing, and many claim it works. When you look at AA, there is so much garbage psychology, philosophy, and theism, yet at it’s basic core is “find god and he will remove your obsession to drink” (forever as long as you go to meetings!). Now the claim that this form of faith healing works is of course with tongue in cheek, since there is now sufficient knowledge that AA doesn’t work (www.orange-papers.org, http://www.morerevealed.com). Yet all 12 Step programs have this core principle, and remain the most prominent “recovery” program in use today even within the medical industry. Wow, faith healing isn’t just some underground phenomenon, it is all over the USA through AA and other 12 Step programs. Now this is a part of our culture / medicine that needs change badly.
Shalini,
Just a note about your conclusions from this piece.
Your accounting for supposed faith healings (fraud, mistaken diagnoses…you list nine) may very well be all true. It seems to be true that God hasn’t healed amputees with any regularity. That is all fine and dandy.
BUT, you use these points to support the conclusion that God is imaginary. Unfortunately for you, your conclusion is unsupported by your premisses. Your logic seems to go like this:
1. Some people who think they are healed instead have gone into spontaneous remission.
2. Therefore God does not exist.
or…
1. Some people fraudulently call themselves faith healers.
2. Therefore God is imaginary.
or…
1. I have never experienced God healing an amputee.
2. Therefore God does not exist.
In each case, your conclusion is totally unrelated to your premiss. Even if your premiss and conclusion are both true, the conclusion is unrelated and therefore unsupported by those premisses.
Bad philosophy leads to wrong ideas about the world.
FAITH IS FAITH>>>>SOME HAVE IT>>>>>SOME DON’T>>>>>>IN THE END>>>>>THOSE THAT HAVE IT>>>>>WILL BE HAPPY>>>>>>>>NO DELUSIONS>>>>>>>NO EXPLANATIONS NEED BE GIVEN>>>>>>FAITH IS FAITH.
cm,
Which conclusions are you talking about? Shalini didn’t give any but one, that there are no miracles to account for.
In each case, your paraphrasings of Shalini’s arguments are made instead from straw and not from any argument of Shalini in this post.
Bad reading comprehension leads to wrong ideas about what you read.
God is real