Welcome to Factonista.org

Factonista is an online freethought advocacy organization that relies on its users for content. Through international broad-based collaboration with its users, and other groups and organizations, it strives to provide timely and comprehensive news, views, reviews, and creative multimedia on issues at the forefront of everything under the umbrella of freethought

Not a member? Register | Lost your password?
Hi and welcome to Factonista. Please keep in mind we're still in BETA. We'll be fully functional very very soon. In the mean while feel free to browse around, read our articles, and participate in our discussions. If you note any bugs and feel like helping us out, forward a quick message to us here. Thanks! [close]

Archive for October, 2008

Friday Five

Friday, October 31st, 2008

Every Friday the crew here at Edger will rank the top five blog posts, videos, science news, and anything else of interest to the freethought community.

5. Richard Dawkins Embarrassed After Death and Subsequent Resurrection

The NewsBiscuit (which manages to publish news before it even happens!) comes in at number five this week with this TheOnion-esque peice on the Jesus-like death of Richard Dawkins.  Further reports are informing me that several different news sources sent out very different press releases, some claiming that only one Mary found Dawkins resurrected, some claiming several, and some even claiming the presence of others.

“Dawkins suffered a shocking but ironic death on Friday having been seized by a mysterious gang of burly men dressed as Roman soldiers. They nailed him to a cross, and left him there until he died some hours later.”

4. Sarah Palin’s War on Science

Oh Hitchens, once again you’ve attacked someone with your impenetrable wit.  Following in the footsteps of Jeffrey Sachs and Sam Harris, the Hitch rants about Palin’s anti-science and anti-elite agenda.  And just for good measure he throws in some pokes at religion.

“With Palin, however, the contempt for science may be something a little more sinister than the bluff, empty-headed plain-man’s philistinism of McCain.”

3. Hell House XVIII, The Revenge: Welcome to Eternity

Light the Whacko-lanterns!  The writers of Atheist Experience attended a Hell House in Cedar Hill, Texas and bring us a frightening tale of utter ignorance and contempt displayed by the Christian community who operate the Hell House.

Part 1

Part 2

2. Where’s Charlton Heston when you need him?

If you wrote a movie script for this incident it would be denied by Hollywood simply because it’s too unbelievable.  Pharyngula gives some of the funniest commentary on this incident.  Never has there been a better story to convey the concept of Poe’s law than Christians praying for the restoration of the economy by crowding around a golden calf!

“Just a clue: there’s this book called “the bible” that these people claim to follow, but I suspect they’ve never actually read it, or they might have seen Exodus 32.”

1. St. Louis Claims First Pregnant Catholic Priest

A Catholic Priestess (you don’t hear that often) named Jessica Rowley is due any day now and will become the first Catholic Priestess to give birth.  I wonder what Bill Donahue will say about this.  Better yet, I wonder what the Pope’s response will be.

“A little over a year ago, 26-year-old Jessica Rowley shattered the stained-glass ceiling, so to speak, by being ordained a Catholic priest. Now the St. Louisan is on the verge of giving birth to her first child, and a Washington, D.C.-based group that advocates for women’s ordination says that makes Rowley the world’s first pregnant Catholic priest. “

This story took the number one spot this week simply because of the impact it should have on the rights of women within Roman Catholicism.

Candles, Chock Full of Engineering

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

Candles appear to be simple objects. They’re just a wick wrapped in wax, right? They are that and much more. Which contains more energy, a molecule of candle wax or a molecule of TNT? The following video answers that question and more…

This video is one from a series called The Periodic Table of Videos by the University of Nottingham. Candles are impressive.

Who is to Blame?

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

I picked the title of this post with the intention of being deliberately ambiguous.

“Who is to blame?” – For what?

For all of the major problems in the United States, well the American public.

Thats right. The public, and that means you and I as well.

We live in an amazing society where each of us is given legal rights to participate in government through the democratic process. This can be done at lots of levels, the most basic of which is perhaps voting.

Voting does not do much on its own, but it is the least a person can do to get what they want out of society.

Far more important and powerful than voting is to influence as many votes as you can.

I have occasionally heard my fellow secularists tell me that they are not interested in politics, and I think to my self, “what a disaster. I can’t even count on the few people who agree with me to make their voices heard.”

Beyond the issues that relate to secularism and separation of Church and State, of clear importance to many of us are issues that relate to science and education policy. I am a Jeffersonian in the sense that I believe democracy requires an informed electorate.

What a cause for cynicism and pain.

I don’t blame either of the candidates in the recent presidential election for stooping to what may seem like simplistic attacks or appeals to the cult of personality. It is necessary to communicate and mobilize the majority of Americans. Why? Because, generally speaking, we are morons.

18 % of Americans believe the Sun goes around the earth.

More than 40% of Americans in a recent study did not read a single book in the course of a year.

More disturbing statistics like this can be found at a great article by Susan Jacoby here.

All in all this is generally linked to my broader outlook, my ethics, my goals in life.

I believe that in a democracy people have to be smart. Whats more is I genuinely believe that people have the potential to be very smart with some good habits and critical thinking skills.

There is little doubt that I will be called naive for thinking this, but I would argue that science is on my side.

The evidence is fairly indicative that intellectual power resides in the brain, it is equally indicative that unless you are brain damaged most brains are pretty much the same.

This implies to me that intelligence can be trained and honed, and is not simply a stroke of luck for a few elites.

I also believe that cultivating intelligence should be the primary political goal of humanity, precisely to improve the workings of democracy.

Until we begin to make strides in these ways we are all at fault for the current woes and sorrows of the United States. Either for being too ignorant and unwilling to improve, or by doing nothing about the ignorance which is so prevalent in our society.

What makes us Human?

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

UPDATE: I LEARNED ONLY RECENTLY THAT SOME OF THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS OUTDATED, AND THAT PLASTICITY IS NOT WHAT IT IMMEDIATELY APPEARED TO BE TO ME. IT IS STILL SOMETHING AWESOME, BUT SOME EXPERIMENTS HAVE SHOWED THAT IT IS NOT AS POWERFUL AS IT INITIALLY SEEMED. YOU CAN READ ONE OF THESE In Karn Stromswold’s article found here.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE:

For centuries we have tried to search for a homonculus within us, that center within our brains that makes us human. Traditionally, we expect this part to transcend all chemicals, and fall in the realm of infinite.

What makes us human? Several factors interacting in complex ways. But if there was one that played the primary role in making us “us”, it would be ‘Neuroplasticity’.

Plasticity allows our brain to break and reconstruct neural pathways. As we go through different experiences and learn new things, new synaptic connections are formed at the expense of old, unused ones. This process is not just limited to the memory organs of the brain, but even the functional ones. For example, if your visual cortex does not do any “learning” or is not exposed to the correct type of information during a critical period, your anatomically perfect eyes may never develop vision. Most likely in this case, your visual cortex which has so far gone unused would break with it’s quasi-predetermined circuitry, and reform to be used by a neighboring part of the brain.

The brain is wider than the sky,
For, put them side by side,
The one the other will include
With ease, and you beside.

The brain is deeper than the sea,
For, hold them, blue to blue,
The one the other will absorb,
As sponges, buckets do.

The brain is just the weight of God,
For, lift them, pound for pound,
And they will differ, if they do,
As syllable from sound.
~ Emily Dickinson

Perhaps more amazingly, in recent decades, the brain has also been observed making recoveries after structural damage. People who suffer from any kind of mental injuries were thought to have completely and permanently lost those abilities. But with the help of MRIs and CAT-scans, researchers noticed that the injured or dead part of the brain can come back to life. It is a tragedy that this information is not yet widespread. Stroke patients who are left paralyzed or are unable to speak after their accident often never try to repeat those lost activities. However, recent cases have shown that often the “broken” part of their brain can recover in full, but since the activity previously assigned to it is no longer performed, it gives up it’s original function and becomes involved in something else.

People who undergo hemispherectomies can make amazing recoveries if their new minds are given the right exercises. It was until the early 1990s considered that the left hemisphere, primarily Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas were solely and exclusively responsible for language. The theory seemed shaky from day one. Not only could we not explain how these functioned (as we can’t yet), but perhaps more importantly, we were unable to recreate any disorders that seemed to emerge from them. But when patients left with only the right hemisphere of their brains defied current theory and produced from single worded to multi-phrased cogent sentences, the theory was just as well out the door.

It is now understood that this ability stays with us for our lifetimes. There are a few known critical periods during which specific functions are favoured. As babies, our mind’s first priority is to develop the key abilities  we use to navigate the world. After the age of two and a half or three, our brain devotes great attention to language learning, as well to sharpening the previously learned skills. After about six, we learn a tremendous amount of things about the world around us…how and why our parents behave, why the sky is blue, and in general how the world works. After about 10 – 12 we turn our attention to sexual maturity and of course the social concerns that come with it.

From this point on, the two sexes begin to differ. But now these changes are very relative, and hardly as crucial. The mind has fully developed, and the rest are the stages of our lives. Missing even one of these critical steps can tremendously change our lives. I personally know of no case where postponing something like language learning has eventually led to “normal” efficacy of that skill, and I can’t imagine it would ever happen. But again, as stated above, some recovery is still possible. It has been observed though that as we get older, neurogenesis occurs in fewer and fewer parts of the brain, being eventually left only in the hippocampus (short-term memory functions). So it is possible to understand why we eventually pass away.

Some recent experiments demonstrate the extreme ways is which our brain can change if subject to abnormal stimulus. One group of researchers cross-connected the audial and visual cortexes of the brain of a Ferret fetus. The experiment’s purpose was to test the permanence of these structures. The experiment’s hypothesis was that they are both very plastic. Indeed this was found to be the case. Visual signal being carried from the retina to the audial cortex produced very similar patterns to what the visual cortex of a normal Ferret would later produce. This implied that the modified audial cortex was now capable of “seeing” and the modified visual cortex was now capable of “hearing”.

One comfort I take from these flurry of discoveries is that they fit in perfectly and beautifully with the modern evolutionary theory. It is very difficult to explain how the brain got to be so complex if all parts evolved by individual selection. But if we understand that these parts are developed as much from their enviornment as from their genes, we see a much more reasonable and explicable world. Understanding neuroplasticity has opened a whole new field of medical care, and has revolutionzed the world of so many. Some have also found applications of it in the so-called Brain-Computer Interface technolgy. But perhaps the greatest reward this discovery holds for us is the secret of how the brain actually works.

“Who wrote your questions?”

Wednesday, October 29th, 2008

Wow, watch this video of Joe Biden being asked the most ill-concieved questions I have ever seen.

This is a great example of how journalism should not be conducted – biased, leading questions loaded with buzzwords.  Not only that, but the buzzwords are the bias that lend itself to the leading of the questions.  Kudos to Biden for handling the situation well.

Hitchens on Palin

Wednesday, October 29th, 2008

Following in the footsteps of Jeffrey Sachs and Sam Harris, Hitchens throws in his tucents with this article attacking Palin’s religious bent and anti-science outlook.

The Burial of Jesus

Tuesday, October 28th, 2008

One of the questions that we should be asking when considering the story of the burial of Jesus is: Does the account of the burial and resurrection of Jesus in the gospels match up with what is known about Jewish laws and traditions at the time?

This post will be my attempt to address this question succinctly. Onwards, skeptics!

Let us first take a look at the law concerning the burial of condemned men in the Mishnah:

They did not bury the condemned in the burial grounds of his ancestors, but there were two graveyards made ready for the use of the court, one for those who were beheaded or strangled, and one for those who were stoned or burned.(6.5e, f)

According to the Mishnah, since Jesus was accused as a blasphemer, he would be buried in the graveyard for the stoned or burned. The Mishnah explains further that only “when the flesh was completely decomposed were the bones gathered and buried in their proper place” (in this case, this would mean the ancestral tomb of Jesus).

It has been clearly shown according to Jewish law that Jesus could not be buried in a private tomb as he had to be placed with the criminals. The problem here is that the gospels clearly say that he was buried in a private tomb
(Matthew 27:60, Luke 23:53, John 19:41). So, does this mean that Jesus was not formally buried on Friday night?

Another interesting fact is that Jews were not allowed to bury their dead on the Sabbath or on the first day of any festival (according to the Talmud). Now, as the Mishnah requires prompt burial, Jews get around this by placing the corpse in a temporary grave before the real burial. Jesus supposedly died on the first day of Passover, and Joseph asked for the body right before the Sabbath. Therefore, there was no way that Joseph could have done all the burial rites. The only way to reconcile to gospel story of Jesus being buried in a private tomb would be if it actually refers to a temporary grave.

Now, let’s take a look at the Semahot:

Whosoever finds a corpse in a tomb should not move it from its place, unless he knows that this is a temporary grave.

By law, Joseph would have been required to place Jesus in a temporary grave. The body could not have been in Joseph’s tomb Sunday morning (where the Gospels claim the women visited it). Yes, they found it empty, but by law, by then his body would have to be in the Graveyard of the Stoned and Burned.

The story gets even more interesting when considering the myth of Jesus being raised from the dead on the third day. There is an interesting third-day pattern in the Midrash Rabbah, which is related to the Mishnah. It shows an overall third-day pattern in the current Jewish understanding of the dead.

Bar Kappara: “Until three days [after death] the soul keeps on returning to the grave, thinking that it will go back [into the body]; but when it sees that the facial features have become disfigured, it departs and abandons it [the body].”

The full force of mourning lasts for three days. Why? Because [for that length of time] the shape of the face is recognizable, even as we have learnt in the Mishnah: Evidence [to prove a man's death] is admissible only in respect of the full face, with the nose, and only [by one who has seen the corpse] within three days [after death].

From the Semahot:

One may go out to the cemetery for three days to inspect the dead for a sign of life, without fear that this smacks of heathen practice. For it happened that a man was inspected after three days, and he went on to live twenty-five years; still another went on to have five children and died later. (8.1)

Thus, in Jewish tradition, it was considered possible for a soul to reunite with its body within three days but not after that as sometime on the third day the soul realized the body was rotting, and then departed.

No, the burial story does not match up with what we know about Jewish law and ritual at the time. All I smell so far is a huge stink.

Responses to common Christian apologetic claims

Monday, October 27th, 2008

The Bible says the Earth is unsupported. (Job 26:7)
This is perhaps one of the best pick-and-choose Christian arguments, in which they single out a few Biblical verses that seemingly support modern science. Christians who make this claim seem to have forgotten to include certain verses (Job 38:4-6) which clearly state that the earth has foundations. This is in exact contradiction to the fact that the earth is unsupported. It even directly contradicts the earlier verse that Christians use to claim that the Earth is unsupported. Anyone seeking to reconcile the Biblical view to the modern scientific view certainly has more than enough passages to select from and interpret; while ignoring others that make the Bible sound like nothing more than a primitive attempt at understanding the world.

The Bible describes the water cycle in astounding detail. (Ecclesiastes 1:7)
Astounding detail? This is what the verse says:
“All streams flow into the sea, yet the sea is never full. To the place the streams come from, there they return again.”

What is so astounding about that? The verse merely says that water returns to the source of the streams. It doesn’t mention anything about condensation or evaporation. This is merely wishful thinking on the part of anyone who deceives themselves into thinking that some sort of divine revelation happened here.

The Bible says the earth is round. (Isaiah 40:22)
The verse reads “He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth”. A circle is flat and without any volume (in contrast to a sphere). Newsflash: A circle and a sphere are not the same things. Isaiah 11:12 refers to the ‘four corners of the earth’. Why don’t mainstream Christians take that as the indicator of the earth’s shape? Telling, isn’t it?

The Bible has always proven to be factually correct.
Are these verses factually correct in light of modern science?

Leviticus 11:6- Rabbits chew their cud and have hooves.
Leviticus 11:20-23- Insects are four-legged, e.g. grasshoppers.

Do I need to go on?

The Bible is historically correct and consistent.

Really? Well, that must be news because as far as I know, Matthew 1:16 and Luke 3:23 cannot even agree regarding Jesus’ lineage. There are also historical records found in China, Egypt, etc. that show life going on normally during the exact time the global flood was alleged to have taken place. For a flood of such epic proportions, something stinks to high heaven (pardon the pun) here.

The Bible is reasonable.
Reasonable? Let’s take a look at Genesis 30:37-39. Did anyone tell you that shoving striped rods in front of animals causes them to have striped offspring? God really needs to learn a thing or two about basic genetics, don’t you think?

In Numbers 22:2-29, Balaam doesn’t seem the least bit surprised to discover that his donkey could suddenly speak. I suppose this must be because stuff like that used to happen every day in Biblical times although the Christian god has become strangely silent now.

Wait, all this is supposed to be reasonable? My bad.

Sorry, Christian apologists. You need to try harder next time.

5 Biblical Contradictions That’ll Make You Contradict Your Own Existence

Monday, October 27th, 2008

If you’ve actually read the bible then you know that contradictions appear more than Jesus on toast, yet it’s not often you see a strident believer standing on a soapbox and preaching the gospel of contradiction.  Instead, he’ll preach that it’s literal truth, or at least that it’s a bunch of helpful metaphors.  Either way you swing it, be it that truth and contradictions only work together when defining ‘oxymoron’, or that a metaphor that contradicts with another metaphor isn’t necessarily the best way to compare things, the bible is only as helpful as the eyes of those who colour it.
So i’ve taken it upon myself – with the help of your friendly neighborhood contradiction preachers – to paint this town red and give you the five best glaring contradictions from the bible, with some modern equivalents to put the proverbial cherry on top.

1. Animal before man? Or man before animal?

So we all know the story…Adam is lonelier than a prepubescent WOW addict so God brings him some animals to name.

The Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone.  I will make a helper suitable for him.  Now the Lord God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air.  He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. [Genesis 18-19]

What the preachers of contradiction have to say about it:

Modern equivalent:

Moderator: Senator McCain, are Americans better off than they were 8 years ago?
McCain: I think you could argue that Americans overall are better off.

Reporter: Senator, you do not believe we are better off by any means than we were 8 years ago
McCain: Oh no…no. (assuredly).

2. Two animals? Or seven animals?

So God didn’t know if he created man or animal first.  So what, we all have brain burps once and awhile.  Surely he must have understood how many animals needed to be put on Noahs ark for them to procreate and once again populate the earth… right?  Two seems reasonable…

You are to bring into the ark two of all living creatures, male and female, to keep them alive with you.  Two of every kind of bird, of every kind of animal and of every kind of creature that moves along the ground will come to you to be kept alive. [Genesis 6:19]

What the preachers of contradiction have to say about it:

Modern equivalent:

McCain: We let spending get completely out of control.  Of course those tax cuts have to remain perminent.

McCain: I voted against the tax cuts

McCain; I voted to extend them

McCain: I voted against the tax cut

McCain: I’ve always been for tax cuts

3. It is finished? Or Father, into your hands I commend my spirit?

God didn’t have the greatest track record through the old testament.  It was violent, barbaric, and nationalistic.  “No wonder it had contradictions,” you say.  “It was so clearly written by man.”…Right?

What you really mean, to take the words right out of Anne Coulter’s mouth, is that the New Testament corrected the Old Testament, contradictions and all.  Unfortunately, the writers of the NT weren’t any less prone to human folly than those who wrote the OT.

According to the way most people contrast the OT and NT, one could reasonably expect Jesus’ last words to be something along the lines of “God, I hath forsaken your Old Testament,” or “Father, I know you were drunk when you wrote the Old Testament.  I’m honoured to have corrected your mistakes.”

Instead Jesus said this:

Jesus called out with a loud voice, “Father, into your hands I commend my spirit.” When he had said this, he breathed his last. [Luke 23:46]

What the preachers of contradiction have to say about it:

Modern equivalent:

Moderator: Senator McCain, you have said repeatedly quote “I know alot less about economics than I do about military informed policy issues.  I still need to be educated.
McCain: Actually, I don’t know where you got that quote from.

McCain: I’ve got to convince people because of my extensive background on the economy and knowledge.

McCain: I don’t have that kind of expertise to know whether exactly he has cut interest rates sufficiently or not.

4. Simon of Cyrene? Or Jesus of Nazareth?

Contradictions aside, the story of Jesus’ crucifixion is stupefyingly mortifying.  They beat him, lashed him, cut him, stuck a ring of thorns around his head, and then made him carry the very device upon which he would die…

So the soldiers took charge of Jesus.  Carrying his own cross, he went out to the place of the Skull.  Here they crucified him…[John 19:17-18]

What the preachers of contradiction have to say about it:

Modern equivalent:

McCain: Neither party should be defined by pandering to the outreaches of American  politics and the agents of intolerance whether they be Lewis Farrakhan or Al Sharpton on the left or Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell on the right.

Reporter: Do you believe that Jerry Falwell is still an agent of intolerance?
McCain: No I don’t

5. Judas committed suicide? Or Judas fell?

Now imagine you’re Judas.  Jesus is dead, and you ratted him out.  In other words, you narked out the one and only son of God – the one who was sent here to die for the sins of all mankind.  Surely that must weigh heavy on your conscience.  It only follows that you’re first option might be to just off yourself…

So Judas thew the money into the temple and left.  Then he went away and hanged himself. [Matthew 27:5]

What the preachers of contradiction have to say about it:

Modern equivalent:

McCain: We either keep our word or we don’t keep our word.  I intend to keep my word to the American people.
Me: See aforementioned contradictions.

* All biblical quotations are from the New International Version (NIV)

* McCain quote sources:
1
2

Lack of Miracles Puzzles Theologians

Sunday, October 26th, 2008

Theologians are baffled today at the complete failure of divine intervention to prevent a recent global wave of starvation, war, and social strife.

“We’re really at a loss,” remarked renowned Christian theologian Alister McGrath. “Yesterday, thousands of people lived, and even died, in a state of extreme undernourishment, which totally defies expectations.” Mr. McGrath explained that “[n]ormally, the case has been that massive, starving populations are fed by manna from heaven, but yesterday everything was totally different.”

Regarding new numbers from this evening projecting an ongoing famine throughout sub-Saharan Africa, McGrath said that “hopefully, everything will be back to normal soon” and recommended increased levels of piety for at least the next 72 hours.

Meanwhile, Muslim theologian Imran Nazar Hosein expressed similar befuddlement over continuing violent strife in Darfur, Iraq, southeastern Europe, and in numerous acts of criminal violence worldwide. “We would expect that, in times like these, God, who is perfectly good and all-powerful, would just make an overt declaration that peace-making is morally good,” he said. “But for the past several days at least, soldiers as young as 12 have been sent to the battlefield in the Sudan, and we’re even getting reports of malevolent acts taking place in the United States itself.”

“We’d probably have to revise the textbooks over this one,” he continued, “if the textbooks weren’t infallible.”

Jewish scholar Shmuley Boteach could not be reached for comment as he was attending a conference on reports of increasingly violent anti-Semitism in Russia and Iran.

“According to all of our best current models, now should be the time that the Virgin Mary appears in a blinding flash of light and shocks all humanity into productive introspection on our inherently sinful nature,” remarked Catholic theologian Joseph “Pope Benedict XVI” Ratzinger. His laboratory in Italy, the well-funded global headquarters for theological inquiry in the field of Catholicism, is still puzzling over data suggesting that the Virgin Mary may have failed to prevent as many as 12 violent deaths in Iraq yesterday.

Ratzinger later said that his crack team of theologians is now combing pictures of windows, unusual cloud formations, and geological simulacra for some evidence of recent Marian activity that “might not have been as blinding as we would like.”

“Our main concern is that yesterday’s events will help fuel speculation by fringe outsiders that there may be an alternative explanation for why things are the way they are,” warned Protestant theologian Jack T. Chick. “But all the data to date suggests that if we just sit tight and continue praying as normal, God will eventually behave in a manner consistent with the established facts of theology.”

Richard Dawkins, a prominent off-the-mainstream theologian whose “There Probably Isn’t a God” theory has proven unpopular with the theological community, released a statement on his website this morning, saying that “[t]his is just one more crack in the crumbling edifice of establishment theology” and hoping that, “in light of this new evidence,” competing theories such as his will one day be taught in public seminary classrooms around the world.