<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain&#8217;s VP pick is Not Good for Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factonista.org/2008/08/29/mccains-vp-pick-is-not-good-for-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factonista.org/2008/08/29/mccains-vp-pick-is-not-good-for-science/</link>
	<description>Science. Humanism. Atheism. Politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:06:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rodrigo Neely</title>
		<link>http://factonista.org/2008/08/29/mccains-vp-pick-is-not-good-for-science/comment-page-1/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodrigo Neely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 10:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theedger.org/?p=894#comment-646</guid>
		<description>Roy,  have you read Sam Harris&#039;s thoughts on her: 

Sam Harris: Sexist Pig and Liberal Shill

I&#039;ve received more than the usual amount of criticism for my recent opinion piece on Sarah Palin, most of it alleging sexism and/or an unseemly infatuation with Barack Obama. For those who care, I&#039;d like to briefly respond:

My alleged sexism: It is true that I used some hackneyed, gender-slanted language in the piece (&quot;get sassy,&quot; &quot;girl-next-door,&quot; etc.). This was deliberate. Clearly, I played this game at my peril. I can say that if Sarah Palin were a man of similar qualifications, I would have used equally slanted language to describe him. I might have called Mr. Palin a &quot;frat-boy&quot; or a &quot;lumberjack.&quot; I would have invoked some silly macho phrasing like,&quot;Watch Cousin Jim flip Putin the bird.&quot; My concern is not that Mrs. Palin is a woman. My concern is that she is a totally unqualified and poorly educated woman who was added to the Republican ticket as a token woman (and Creationist wacko). For what it&#039;s worth, the article was vetted by the two women closest to me (wife and mother) and by two female editors at the LA Times. If anything, the editing at the Times made the piece even more &quot;sexist.&quot;

My alleged Obamamania: Many McCain supporters have written to say that (1) Obama is also unqualified (or even less qualified than Palin) and (2) I have shown myself to be a hypocrite by not objecting to Obama&#039;s religiosity. Briefly: My criticism of Palin should not be construed as uncritical acceptance of Obama. Needless to say, I find Obama&#039;s religious pandering repulsive. The suspicion that he is pandering, out of obvious necessity, and not quite as religious as he makes out, is somewhat comforting, however. But even if Obama were precisely as religious as he appears, he is not a Creationist, Rapture-Ready blockhead. Palin, by all appearances, seems to be one. This is a difference worth noting. Whatever you may think of his politics, Obama is very intelligent and reasonably well educated. Palin thinks the universe is 6000 years old. Unfortunately, I wrote my article before some of the most disturbing signs of her religious extremism came to light.

So, let me simply declare that I would be overjoyed to have a qualified woman in the White House. I would, likewise, be overjoyed to have a qualified African American in the White House. In fact, I would be overjoyed to have a qualified WASP man in the White House. I will be guardedly optimistic to have a very smart (and somewhat qualified) Barack Obama in the White House. And I would be frankly terrified to have a religious bumpkin like Sarah Palin in the White House. I think you should share this last conviction. Hence my latest opinion piece.

Best,
Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roy,  have you read Sam Harris&#8217;s thoughts on her: </p>
<p>Sam Harris: Sexist Pig and Liberal Shill</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve received more than the usual amount of criticism for my recent opinion piece on Sarah Palin, most of it alleging sexism and/or an unseemly infatuation with Barack Obama. For those who care, I&#8217;d like to briefly respond:</p>
<p>My alleged sexism: It is true that I used some hackneyed, gender-slanted language in the piece (&#8221;get sassy,&#8221; &#8220;girl-next-door,&#8221; etc.). This was deliberate. Clearly, I played this game at my peril. I can say that if Sarah Palin were a man of similar qualifications, I would have used equally slanted language to describe him. I might have called Mr. Palin a &#8220;frat-boy&#8221; or a &#8220;lumberjack.&#8221; I would have invoked some silly macho phrasing like,&#8221;Watch Cousin Jim flip Putin the bird.&#8221; My concern is not that Mrs. Palin is a woman. My concern is that she is a totally unqualified and poorly educated woman who was added to the Republican ticket as a token woman (and Creationist wacko). For what it&#8217;s worth, the article was vetted by the two women closest to me (wife and mother) and by two female editors at the LA Times. If anything, the editing at the Times made the piece even more &#8220;sexist.&#8221;</p>
<p>My alleged Obamamania: Many McCain supporters have written to say that (1) Obama is also unqualified (or even less qualified than Palin) and (2) I have shown myself to be a hypocrite by not objecting to Obama&#8217;s religiosity. Briefly: My criticism of Palin should not be construed as uncritical acceptance of Obama. Needless to say, I find Obama&#8217;s religious pandering repulsive. The suspicion that he is pandering, out of obvious necessity, and not quite as religious as he makes out, is somewhat comforting, however. But even if Obama were precisely as religious as he appears, he is not a Creationist, Rapture-Ready blockhead. Palin, by all appearances, seems to be one. This is a difference worth noting. Whatever you may think of his politics, Obama is very intelligent and reasonably well educated. Palin thinks the universe is 6000 years old. Unfortunately, I wrote my article before some of the most disturbing signs of her religious extremism came to light.</p>
<p>So, let me simply declare that I would be overjoyed to have a qualified woman in the White House. I would, likewise, be overjoyed to have a qualified African American in the White House. In fact, I would be overjoyed to have a qualified WASP man in the White House. I will be guardedly optimistic to have a very smart (and somewhat qualified) Barack Obama in the White House. And I would be frankly terrified to have a religious bumpkin like Sarah Palin in the White House. I think you should share this last conviction. Hence my latest opinion piece.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Greenstein</title>
		<link>http://factonista.org/2008/08/29/mccains-vp-pick-is-not-good-for-science/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Greenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theedger.org/?p=894#comment-594</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s also a member of several Dominionist and Christian Nationalist organizations including Eagle Forum, Christian Coalition, and Concerned Women of America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s also a member of several Dominionist and Christian Nationalist organizations including Eagle Forum, Christian Coalition, and Concerned Women of America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chedstone</title>
		<link>http://factonista.org/2008/08/29/mccains-vp-pick-is-not-good-for-science/comment-page-1/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>Chedstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 07:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theedger.org/?p=894#comment-578</guid>
		<description>I hear Canada is great, let me know when you&#039;re ready to go.  I need a roommate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear Canada is great, let me know when you&#8217;re ready to go.  I need a roommate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://factonista.org/2008/08/29/mccains-vp-pick-is-not-good-for-science/comment-page-1/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 18:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theedger.org/?p=894#comment-558</guid>
		<description>What a bimbo. Sad.

The Republicans used to scream &quot;DANGEROUSLY INEXPERIENCED!!!!&quot; when talking about Obama.

Now they have suddenly retired that tagline. They are so disingenuous. But then, being disingenuous has pretty much become a core Republican value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a bimbo. Sad.</p>
<p>The Republicans used to scream &#8220;DANGEROUSLY INEXPERIENCED!!!!&#8221; when talking about Obama.</p>
<p>Now they have suddenly retired that tagline. They are so disingenuous. But then, being disingenuous has pretty much become a core Republican value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theo Bromine</title>
		<link>http://factonista.org/2008/08/29/mccains-vp-pick-is-not-good-for-science/comment-page-1/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>Theo Bromine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theedger.org/?p=894#comment-557</guid>
		<description>Not that being in Canada helps much - I consider that we are one of the largest group of unenfranchised constituents who will be affected by the outcome of the US election, whichever way it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that being in Canada helps much &#8211; I consider that we are one of the largest group of unenfranchised constituents who will be affected by the outcome of the US election, whichever way it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Zhang</title>
		<link>http://factonista.org/2008/08/29/mccains-vp-pick-is-not-good-for-science/comment-page-1/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Zhang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theedger.org/?p=894#comment-542</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m extremely happy about this pick. Aside from McCain-Jindal, this is the worst possible VP selection that McCain could have made. It&#039;s a desperate ploy to try to attract the Hillary voters, who by-and-large are socially liberal like their former candidate and hopefully won&#039;t fall for this gimmick.

Palin has far less experience and none of the gravitas of Obama; in an interview one year ago she actually asked a CNBC host what the vice president actually does that is important. Her &#039;experience&#039; consists of being a former PTA member and mayor of a hamlet of 9000 people.

Even conservatives are angry about this pick; Pat Buchanan said that Palin was &#039;completely unqualified&#039; to hold the office of VP. The far-right National Review&#039;s Ranesh Ponnuru came to the same conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m extremely happy about this pick. Aside from McCain-Jindal, this is the worst possible VP selection that McCain could have made. It&#8217;s a desperate ploy to try to attract the Hillary voters, who by-and-large are socially liberal like their former candidate and hopefully won&#8217;t fall for this gimmick.</p>
<p>Palin has far less experience and none of the gravitas of Obama; in an interview one year ago she actually asked a CNBC host what the vice president actually does that is important. Her &#8216;experience&#8217; consists of being a former PTA member and mayor of a hamlet of 9000 people.</p>
<p>Even conservatives are angry about this pick; Pat Buchanan said that Palin was &#8216;completely unqualified&#8217; to hold the office of VP. The far-right National Review&#8217;s Ranesh Ponnuru came to the same conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jokermage</title>
		<link>http://factonista.org/2008/08/29/mccains-vp-pick-is-not-good-for-science/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>jokermage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theedger.org/?p=894#comment-524</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So…who wants to move out of the US with me if McCain gets elected?&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://xkcd.com/180/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;If you die in Canada, you die in real life.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So…who wants to move out of the US with me if McCain gets elected?</i></p>
<p><a href="http://xkcd.com/180/" rel="nofollow">If you die in Canada, you die in real life.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike W</title>
		<link>http://factonista.org/2008/08/29/mccains-vp-pick-is-not-good-for-science/comment-page-1/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theedger.org/?p=894#comment-515</guid>
		<description>uhh, i feel sick,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uhh, i feel sick,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
